Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
Writing Makefile for Net::validMX

validMX

'make install' to install the module and program.

Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 7.10.3077
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

cp lib/Net/validMX.pm blib\lib\Net\validMX.pm

Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 7.10.3077
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

	C:\cpanrun\build\5-10-0\bin\perl.exe "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(1, 'blib\lib', 'blib\arch')" t/*.t
t/00-load.....1..1
ok 1 - use Net::validMX;
# Testing Net::validMX 2.2.0, Perl 5.010000, C:\cpanrun\build\5-10-0\bin\perl.exe
ok
t/01-fail.....1..11
postmaster@[127.0.0.1]
	Valid MX? False - Use of IP Address [127.0.0.1] instead of a hostname is not allowed

ok 1 - Test for Explicit IP instead of domain name
test@test4.peregrinehw.com
	Valid MX? False - Domain is publishing only invalid and/or blank MX records

ok 2 - Test for a host that is configured with an MX of . & priority 10 which will be considered a pass due eNom.com (name-services.com) false positives - Should Fail if it's the only MX
nofrom@www
	Valid MX? False - No MX or A Records Exist for www

ok 3 - Test for non-FQDN
test@test3.peregrinehw.com
	Valid MX? False - Domain is publishing a blank MX record at Priority 0

ok 4 - Test for a host that is configured with an MX of . & priority 0 which is an 'I don't do email' Notification - Should Fail
zqy152214@liyuanculture.com
	Valid MX? True


#   Failed test 'Test for incorrect DNS'
#   at t/01-fail.t line 25.
not ok 5 - Test for incorrect DNS
#          got: '1'
#     expected: '0'
formation2005@carmail.com
	Valid MX? True


#   Failed test 'Test for incorrect DNS'
#   at t/01-fail.t line 27.
#          got: '1'
#     expected: '0'
not ok 6 - Test for incorrect DNS
test@geg.com
	Valid MX? False - Invalid use of private IP (e.g. 10.23.42.11) range for MX - All MX Records Failed

ok 7 - Test for privatized IP range use only
test@test5.peregrinehw.com
	Valid MX? False - Invalid use of private IP (e.g. 192.168.1.1) range for MX - All MX Records Failed

ok 8 - Test for privatized IP range use only
test@tennesseen.com
	Valid MX? False - MX Record: dev.null does not resolve

ok 9 - Test for non-resolvable MX records
zacaris@muska.com
	Valid MX? True


#   Failed test 'Resolves to an implicit cname that is chained to a cname - fails but not certain I should allow this or not'
#   at t/01-fail.t line 35.
not ok 10 - Resolves to an implicit cname that is chained to a cname - fails but not certain I should allow this or not
#          got: '1'
#     expected: '0'
test@test2.peregrinehw.com
	Valid MX? False - Invalid use of private IP (e.g. 192.168.0.1) range for MX

# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 11.
ok 11 - Test for use of crazy things like 192.168.0.1. as the host name in DNS - Should FAIL EVEN if $allow_ip_address_as_mx = 1 because they are privatized not because of the name
dubious
	Test returned status 3 (wstat 768, 0x300)
DIED. FAILED tests 5-6, 10
	Failed 3/11 tests, 72.73% okay
t/02-pass.....1..8
kevin.mcgrail@thoughtworthy.com
	Valid MX? True

ok 1 - Test for correct DNS - Should Pass
test@tri-llama.com
	Valid MX? True

ok 2 - Test non-rfc compliant DNS using cname for MX - Should Pass
test@mail.mcgrail.com
	Valid MX? True

ok 3 - Test for implicit MX by A record - Should Pass
AirchieChalmers@londo.cysticercus.com
	Valid MX? False - No MX or A Records Exist for londo.cysticercus.com


#   Failed test 'Test for something that was throwing an error in v1 where we need to discard the first answer on a CNAME domain - Should Pass'
#   at t/02-pass.t line 23.
not ok 4 - Test for something that was throwing an error in v1 where we need to discard the first answer on a CNAME domain - Should Pass
#          got: '0'
#     expected: '1'
OlgaCraft@barbequesauceofthemonthclub.com
	Valid MX? True

ok 5 - Test for something that was throwing an error in v1 where we need to discard the first answer on a CNAME domain - Should Pass
test@test.peregrinehw.com
	Valid MX? True

ok 6 - Test for the use of crazy things like 12.34.56.78. as the host name in DNS - Should Pass if $allow_ip_address_as_mx = 1
god@va
	Valid MX? True

ok 7 - Test for unusual top level domain setups like .va for the Vatican
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 8.
test@test6.peregrinehw.com
	Valid MX? True

ok 8 - Test for a host that is configured with an MX of . but eventually has a good MX recorded (due to eNom.com (name-services.com) false positives - Should Pass
dubious
	Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
DIED. FAILED test 4
	Failed 1/8 tests, 87.50% okay
t/03-valid....1..3
ok 1 - Test for valid email format
ok 2 - Test for invalid email format without sanitize
ok 3 - Test for invalid email with spaces
ok
t/04-full.....1..3
kevin.mcgrail@thoughtworthy.com
	Valid MX? True - Passed

ok 1 - Test for valid email format
kevin.mcgrail@aol
	Valid MX? True - Passed

ok 2 - Test for valid email format with sanitize
kevin.mcgrail @ ThoughtWorthy .com
	Valid MX? True - Passed

ok 3 - Test for valid email with spaces
ok
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail  List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/01-fail.t    3   768    11    3  5-6 10
t/02-pass.t    1   256     8    1  4
Failed 2/5 test scripts. 4/26 subtests failed.
Files=5, Tests=26,  7 wallclock secs ( 0.00 cusr +  0.00 csys =  0.00 CPU)
Failed 2/5 test programs. 4/26 subtests failed.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'C:\cpanrun\build\5-10-0\bin\perl.exe' : return code '0xff'
Stop.